« Is foresight missing in policy planning? | Main | Quoting Burch »

May 04, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452cca869e200e5520e50dd8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Streamline the justice system:

Comments

Merianna

I think attending Court is part of the punishment for speading.

Whilst I can agree to 'tick the box, pay fine, collect demerits' for speeds up to 55 kpg - to allow people to easily pay and collect penalties for travelling twice the speed limit (70kpg)is too easy an option for many.

Courts need streamlining but road need to be made safer and excess speed - and twice the limit is certainly excess - is a major problem.

Denis Pitcher

Merianna,

"I think attending Court is part of the punishment for speading."

Then we've come up with the wrong punishments when the court system is so backed up that we cease to crack down on speeding.

The reason why I chose 70kph is that it is my understanding that if you travel over that speed you are highly likely to lose your license for a year. At that point it is necessary for you to see the courts to evaluate if that is the case.

Regardless of the speed, my arguement is that we should not waste our court's time with unnecessary guilty pleas. If they are travelling under the speed at which your license will be automatically revoked, then they shouldn't have to attend court to plead guilty.

The demerit point system, if instituted effectively, will take care of removing the licenses of those who speed regularly.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About

Random musings on politics, finance and life on the 21 square mile string of islands often referred to as Bermuda, by Denis Pitcher.

Email



Twitter musings

    follow me on Twitter



    Subscribe for Email Updates

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    RSS

     Subscribe in a reader

    Powered by TypePad